tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3456182.post3072711200214777654..comments2023-05-15T06:09:57.440-04:00Comments on as seen through the lens: The Big ReadAnonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02674153833571650706noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3456182.post-59731594771899211602008-08-04T13:47:00.000-04:002008-08-04T13:47:00.000-04:0020 out of 100, but I totally disagree with the lis...20 out of 100, but I totally disagree with the list. The list seems to span a hort-load of time but so many amazing classic works aren't even on the list! What a sham... I feel ripped off! I want my money back!steve@enginposthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10039393908809770143noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3456182.post-39347169449455987402008-08-02T20:23:00.000-04:002008-08-02T20:23:00.000-04:00I've read 36 of 100 but I don't get this list. Sha...I've read 36 of 100 but I don't get this list. Shakespear has a "complete works of" in the 20s, then an individual entry for "Hamlet" later on; same thing for CS Lewis. Pullman's "His Dark Materials" made the list but not Asimov? I wonder if the criteria for this is quality or quantity of books sold...<BR/><BR/>Oh well, at least it's a good subject. I think the appreciation for the printed page has waned over the years. That was one of the best benefits of working at BN.com - free books.<BR/><BR/>Well done Clau. Your blog is always good for something to talk about :)<BR/><BR/>AFAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3456182.post-43296882531732609852008-08-02T17:55:00.000-04:002008-08-02T17:55:00.000-04:00Love this post, Clau. Thanks for bringing my atten...Love this post, Clau. Thanks for bringing my attention to it. Made my own list! Perhaps one day to be followed up by my favorites. Do you have ones you re-read over and over?Chelchttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13212752615708008322noreply@blogger.com